[Abel-tasman] ***SPAM*** Turn 60 minutes into $379?

Work From Home WorkFromHome at ezfoshleva.info
Wed Aug 7 01:39:27 CEST 2013


This local mom *never* thought she’d make
$7,487 in one month working from home…

That's right... She went from unemployed to making
$379+ a day on the internet and now she shared
her incredible story with us

I’ve said enough, just read this post right NOW, okay?
Here’s the link:

http://www.ezfoshleva.info/1780/91/194/838/1718.10tt62883642AAF9.php


==> Read The Full Post Now - Click Here

-WAH Team

 

 

_______________________________________________

If you don't want any more correspondance about this offer visit here http://www.ezfoshleva.info/1780/91/194/838/1718.10tt62883642AAF6.html or write to:
BR LLC. WAHU, PO BOX 441206, Houston, TX 77244-1206
 













Undated: A Facebook graphic, by the group Credo Action, asking Facebook 
founder Mark Zuckerberg to stop supporting ads backing the Keystone XL Pipeline.CREDOFILE: 
April 4, 2013: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg during a company press event 
in Menlo Park, Calif.REUTERSFacebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is facing a 
backlash from the left over ads that support drilling in Alaska and 
the Canada-to-Texas Keystone pipeline, as the young billionaire wades ever-deeper 
into charged political debates.The daisy chain that connects Zuckerberg 
with the drilling ads starts with FWD.US, the bipartisan group Zuckerberg 
co-founded for the purpose of supporting immigration legislation. That organization 
gave money to a conservative group, Americans for a Conservative Direction, 
that aired a TV ad supporting South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. 
It also gave to a group that put up an ad backing 
drilling in Alaska.Graham is among the eight senators who crafted the bipartisan 
immigration legislation now being debated on Capitol Hill. However, Graham 
appears in the ad criticizing President Obama for not approving the Keystone 
pipeline, which supporters say will help the United Sates achieve energy 
independence and critics say will be an environmental hazard.The president 
says Im for all of the above when it comes to energy, 
Graham says in the 60-second spot. Well, those are words coming out 
of his mouth. They dont come from his heart. No Keystone pipeli
on members, they 
said, now appear to view al-Nusra more warily.In public comments Tuesday, 
Dempsey said the U.S. could provide weapons that might make the rebels 
more "militarily effective."But, he warned, it's not clear "whether the 
military effect would produce the kind of outcome I think that not 
only members of Congress but all of us would desire, which is, 
you know, an end to the violence, some kind of political reconciliation 
among the parties and a stable Syria."However, a U.S. official said military 
planners believe that it would be possible to vet the rebel fighting 
forces and that those under Free Syrian Army chief Gen. Salim Idriss 
and the Supreme Military Council are seen as independent of al-Nusra.The 
official said the military planners also believe that Idriss' forces would 
be prime candidates to receive arms, if and when Obama makes the 
decision to start providing lethal assistance.Arming the rebels could take 
any number of paths. If ordered, the U.S. military could provide the 
weapons to rebel groups, or the Pentagon could use the State Department 
as an intermediary and transfer the weapons through those channels. Under 
a more covert scenario, the CIA could secretly provide the arms.At the 
Pentagon on Wednesday, press secretary George Little said there are discussions 
underway on how to bolster humanitarian assistance and how to engage even 
more closely with the opposition forces."We're fully cognizant of the role 
that
 





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20130806/2b801a2b/attachment.htm


More information about the Abel-tasman mailing list