[Abel-tasman] Life is short. Have an affair.

[Ashley Madison Affiliate]

World's leading married dating service for discreet encounters

http://www.ukncbdb.us/2943/167/362/1374/2814.10tt62883642AAF11.html






Unsub- http://www.ukncbdb.us/2943/167/362/1374/2814.10tt62883642AAF12.html











assaulted    because 
they were perceived as gay. About 13 percent of lesbians said the 
same.A separate study of young people in England also found that, in 
their teens, gay boys and lesbians were almost twice as likely to 
be bullied as their straight peers. By young adulthood, it was about 
the same for lesbians and straight girls. But in this study, published 
recently in the journal Pediatrics, gay young men were almost four times 
more likely than their straight peers to be bullied.At least one historian 
says it wasn't always that way for either men or women, whose 
"expressions of love" with friends of the same gender were seen as 
a norm    even idealized    in the 
19th century."These relationships offered ample opportunity for those who 
would have wanted to act on it physically, even if most did 
not," says Thomas Foster, associate professor and head of the history department 
at DePaul University in Chicago.Today's "code of male gendered behavior," 
he says, often rejects these kinds of expressions between men.We joke about 
the "bro-mance"    a term used to describe close friendships 
between straight men. But in some sense, the humor stems from the 
insinuation that those relationships could be romantic, though everyone 
assumes they aren't.Call those friends "gay," a word that's still commonly 
used as an insult, and that's quite another thing. Consider the furor 
over Rutgers University men's basketball coach Mike Rice, who was recently 

isis in Syria."President Obama has said 
the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S. 
position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said 
last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement 
or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number 
one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall 
into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the 
question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., 
also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if 
correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But 
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United 
States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure 
about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although 
we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a 
spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information 
is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously, 
we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of 
chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is 
why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation 
that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131106/89ed2aa1/attachment.htm