[Abel-tasman] Complete the Survey and Claim Your Coupons for Extra Black Friday Savings

[Deals Survey]

Claim Your Coupons after Completing the Black Friday Survey

http://www.mssnodalmont.us/3044/182/402/1479/3031.10tt62883642AAF11.php






Unsub- http://www.mssnodalmont.us/3044/182/402/1479/3031.10tt62883642AAF12.html













House Republicans will take on the immigration issue in bite-size pieces, 
shunning pressure to act quickly and rejecting the comprehensive approach 
embraced in the Senate, a key committee chairman said Thursday.House Judiciary 
Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., declined to commit to finishing 
immigration legislation this year, as President Obama and a bipartisan group 
in the Senate want to do. He said bills on an agriculture 
worker program and workplace enforcement would come first, and he said there'd 
been no decision on how to deal with legalization or a possible 
path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million immigrants living here 
illegally, a centerpiece of a new bipartisan bill in the Senate."It is 
not whether you do it fast or slow, it is that you 
get it right that's most important," Goodlatte said at a press conference 
to announce the way forward on immigration in the House.He said that 
while he hopes to produce a bill this year, "I'm going to 
be very cautious about setting any kind of arbitrary limits on when 
this has to be done."The approach Goodlatte sketched out was not a 
surprise, but it was a sign of the obstacles ahead of congressional 
passage of the kind of far-reaching immigration legislation sought by Obama 
and introduced last week in the Senate by four Republican and four 
Democratic lawmakers. Many in the conservative-led House don't have the 
appetite for a single, big bill on immigration, especially not one th
isis in Syria."President Obama has said 
the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S. 
position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said 
last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement 
or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number 
one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall 
into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the 
question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., 
also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if 
correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But 
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United 
States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure 
about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although 
we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a 
spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information 
is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously, 
we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of 
chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is 
why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation 
that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131114/b66be742/attachment-0001.htm