[Abel-tasman] World's leading married dating service for discreet encounters

[Ashley Madison Affiliate]

Recapture The Feeling

http://www.mbbredals.us/3295/167/364/1374/2815.10tt62883642AAF13.php






Unsub- http://www.mbbredals.us/3295/167/364/1374/2815.10tt62883642AAF14.html











Top-ranking lawmakers on both sides of the aisle declared Thursday that 
the "red line" in Syria has been crossed, calling for "strong" U.S. 
and international intervention after administration officials revealed the 
intelligence community believes chemical weapons were used.Sen. John McCain, 
R-Ariz., and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate intelligence 
committee, were among those urging swift action.McCain, who has long called 
for more involvement in Syria, voiced concern that the administration would 
use "caveats" to avoid acting on the new intelligence. He said America's 
enemies are paying "close attention" to whether the U.S. follows through, 
as the White House signaled it wanted to see more proof before 
responding to the new information."I worry that the president and the administration 
will use these caveats as an excuse not to act right away 
or act at all," McCain told Fox News. "The president clearly stated 
that it was a red line and that it couldn't be crossed 
without the United States taking vigorous action."He called for the U.S. 
to help establish a no-fly zone and "safe zone" in Syria, as 
well as provide weapons to the "right people."Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel 
first revealed the intelligence assessment, which was detailed in a letter 
to select members of Congress, while speaking to reporters on a visit 
to Abu Dhabi. The administration then released those letters, which said 
U.S. intelligence determined
Voters are divided over how the White House is handling the September 
11, 2012 attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed 
a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. On President Obamas role, however, 
voters are clear: he should have been more involved.A Fox News poll 
asked voters about their reaction to former Defense Secretary Leon Panettas 
testimony to Congress in February on the Benghazi attack. Panetta testified 
that after the initial 5:00 PM briefing with the president, he didnt 
hear from the President Obama or anyone at the White House again 
that night. CLICK TO VIEW THE FOX NEWS POLLWhile almost a third 
of voters (29 percent) think there was probably a good reason for 
the president not to be personally involved, most voters -- 61 percent 
-- say Obama should have been directly involved no matter what.Most Republicans 
(82 percent) and over half of independents (57 percent) feel the president 
should have been more engaged in responding to the assault. Among Democrats 
views are split: 43 percent say Obama had a good reason not 
to be involved, while 45 percent say theres no excuse.The new poll, 
released Wednesday, also asked voters to react to former Secretary of State 
Hillary Clintons testimony that she hadnt seen a cable from the consulate 
asking for additional security and warning the administration about the 
dangerous situation diplomats were facing. Some 39 percent of voters say 
it is troubling Clinton didn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131129/996f3b9d/attachment-0001.htm