[Abel-tasman] See the difference yourself, 360 spinning design cleans like no other mop

[Hurricane Mop]

Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?

http://www.escarpungeltbe.us/2567/153/335/1270/2693.10tt62883642AAF11.php





Unsub- http://www.escarpungeltbe.us/2567/153/335/1270/2693.10tt62883642AAF12.html












ncies' own estimates.Heritage found 
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40 
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed 
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services 
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the 
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with 
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was 
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel 
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion 
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as 
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA 
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions 
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules 
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations 
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of 
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama 
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency. 
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits 
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this 
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
ddition to cash-strapped county coffers, especially in the Northwest. 
In recent years, the law has acted as a subsidy for states 
and counties hard hit by logging declines triggered by measures to protect 
threatened species.Idaho's Valley County, for example, would have to return 
more than $128,000 from its budget of $2.5 million for roads and 
schools. That leaves Gordon Cruickshank, chairman of the Valley County commission, 
in a no-win position. Should he forgo the repaving of even a 
single mile of the county's 300 miles of paved roads, defer maintenance 
on a bridge or lay off two county employees?"We are struggling really 
hard now to figure out what to do," Cruickshank said. "It's a 
tough pill to swallow that they sent these payments out just a 
few months before sequestration, and now they want them back."The Forest 
Service has paid billions of dollars to counties over the decades, but 
the receipts dwindled as logging on national forests dropped precipitously 
in the 1990s -- first in the Northwest to protect the northern 
spotted owl and salmon, and then later across the country as concerns 
grew over the impact of clear-cut logging on wildlife and clean water.In 
2000, Wyden led the charge for a new law, called the Secure 
Rural Schools Act, a way for the government to pay counties that 
no longer could depend on revenue from logging in federal forests. But 
the law has expired, and the last payments went out in January. 
Wyden and other l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131017/eb2ed5ab/attachment.htm