[Abel-tasman] Controversial Fruit Melt Fat FAST

BB3 BB3 at quintsdotnpk.us
Fri Oct 25 02:37:31 CEST 2013


How To LOSE 20-40 Lbs in 2013? (Hint: Eat this 1 TINY Fruit)...

http://www.quintsdotnpk.us/2693/170/369/1387/2865.10tt62883642AAF21.php







Unsub- http://www.quintsdotnpk.us/2693/170/369/1387/2865.10tt62883642AAF12.html












The White House budget office is recalculating how to apply automatic spending 
cuts for a handful of agencies, freeing up almost $4 billion for 
the Pentagon and another $1 billion or so for Homeland Security Department 
and NASA.Capitol Hill aides familiar with the White House changes say the 
administration has identified almost $5 billion in cuts that can be restored 
under its reading of the arcane budget rules governing the across-the-board 
cuts, known as sequestration. The calculations would restore $5 billion 
of the scheduled $85 billion in automatic sequestration cuts.An administration 
official confirmed the calculations Friday but declined to comment further 
because the process is ongoing. The official and congressional aides spoke 
on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the 
changes publicly.The move comes amid increasing public pressure to find 
ways to lessen the impact of sequestration. Federal agencies are warning 
that the mandatory cuts could mean cutbacks in services. Last week, Congress 
passed and President Obama signed legislation giving the Federal Aviation 
Administration the ability to avoid furloughs that were causing flight delays 
by tapping money in other accounts.The cuts officially began in March after 
Congress and Obama could not reach an agreement on a broader budget 
deal. The automatic cuts had been imposed under a hard-fought 2011 debt 
and budget pact.The cuts have so far failed to live
ts offered an amendment that declared climate 
change to be caused by humans.The amendment said: "Congress accepts the 
scientific findings of the Environmental Protection Agency that climate 
changes is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant 
risks for public health and welfare."That amendment failed, on a 184-240 
vote -- which is where the 240 number came from in the 
OFA ad.But three of those no votes were Democrats. And not all 
of the Republicans who voted against the amendment are on record saying 
climate change is a sham. Republicans, rather, complained at the time that 
the amendment was not pertinent to the underlying bill.So where does the 
word "hoax" come from?There appear to be a couple instances. One, according 
to the Post, was from a Democrat, Rep. Henry Waxman, who said 
at the time that the Republican bill's premise was "that climate change 
is a hoax."The other was a quote from Republican Georgia Rep. Paul 
Broun, nestled into the Obama group's video right after the vote factoid. 
Broun said: "The idea of human-induced global climate change is one of 
the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community. It is a 
hoax."But as FactCheck.org pointed out, that quote was from 2009, two years 
earlier.FactCheck.org also said that Broun and other Republicans who completely 
deny a link to human activity are "off base." But the group 
noted there is a diversity of opinion among the GOP caucus on 
t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131024/5b844e53/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Abel-tasman mailing list