[Abel-tasman] See photos of other singles in your area at Match!

[Match.com Partner]

Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!

http://www.leavezeropheon.us/2718/107/216/997/1978.10tt62883642AAF18.php







Unsub- http://www.leavezeropheon.us/2718/107/216/997/1978.10tt62883642AAF8.html











a year later, neither side in the contraception 
debate was happy with the FDA's surprise twist, which many perceived as 
an attempt to find a palatable middle ground between imposing an age 
limit of 17 and imposing no limit at all.Any over-the-counter access marks 
a long-awaited change, but it's not enough, said Dr. Cora Breuner of 
the American Academy of Pediatrics, which supports nonprescription sale 
of the morning-after pill for all ages."We still have the major issue, 
which is our teen pregnancy rate is still too high," Breuner said.Even 
though few young girls likely would use Plan B, which costs about 
$50 for a single pill, "we know that it is safe for 
those under 15," she said.Most 17- to 19-year-olds are sexually active, 
and 30 percent of 15- and 16-year-olds have had sex, according to 
a study published last month by the journal Pediatrics. Sex is much 
rarer among younger teens. Likewise, older teens have a higher pregnancy 
rate, but that study also counted more than 110,000 pregnancies among 15- 
and 16-year-olds in 2008 alone.Contraception advocates see a double standard. 
No one is carded when buying a condom, but under the FDA's 
decision they would have to prove their age when buying a pill 
to prevent pregnancy if that condom breaks."This isn't a compromise. This 
is wrong," said Cynthia Pearson of the National Women's Health Network.Social 
conservatives were outraged by the FDA's move to lower the age limits 
for Plan B -- as w
a year later, neither side in the contraception 
debate was happy with the FDA's surprise twist, which many perceived as 
an attempt to find a palatable middle ground between imposing an age 
limit of 17 and imposing no limit at all.Any over-the-counter access marks 
a long-awaited change, but it's not enough, said Dr. Cora Breuner of 
the American Academy of Pediatrics, which supports nonprescription sale 
of the morning-after pill for all ages."We still have the major issue, 
which is our teen pregnancy rate is still too high," Breuner said.Even 
though few young girls likely would use Plan B, which costs about 
$50 for a single pill, "we know that it is safe for 
those under 15," she said.Most 17- to 19-year-olds are sexually active, 
and 30 percent of 15- and 16-year-olds have had sex, according to 
a study published last month by the journal Pediatrics. Sex is much 
rarer among younger teens. Likewise, older teens have a higher pregnancy 
rate, but that study also counted more than 110,000 pregnancies among 15- 
and 16-year-olds in 2008 alone.Contraception advocates see a double standard. 
No one is carded when buying a condom, but under the FDA's 
decision they would have to prove their age when buying a pill 
to prevent pregnancy if that condom breaks."This isn't a compromise. This 
is wrong," said Cynthia Pearson of the National Women's Health Network.Social 
conservatives were outraged by the FDA's move to lower the age limits 
for Plan B -- as w


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131025/ce22d47e/attachment.htm