[Abel-tasman] Brain Doctors Hate Him...

[Cognizine]

NASA Doctor Reveals How To Reverse Brain Age

http://www.unowedlecheabz.us/2771/172/375/1393/2923.10tt62883642AAF7.php






Unsub- http://www.unowedlecheabz.us/2771/172/375/1393/2923.10tt62883642AAF8.html












arts now," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid acknowledged after 
Thursday's vote.He assured Democrats that a proposal to renew the assault 
weapons ban and a ban on high-capacity magazines would get a vote 
as an amendment, though it was dropped from the main bill amid 
intense opposition.The main bill also includes a measure to increase school 
safety funding.Reid lost two Democrats in Thursday's vote -- Sen. Mark Pryor, 
D-Ark., and Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, both lawmakers from states with 
a strong tradition of gun ownership.More than a dozen Republican senators 
for days had threatened to hold up the bill Thursday. They voiced 
concern that the proposal -- namely, the background checks provision -- 
would infringe on Second Amendment rights and impose a burden on law-abiding 
gun owners. They also expressed frustration that, while Manchin and Toomey 
touted their compromise measure, the bill on the table Thursday did not 
yet include that. Rather, it included a stricter background checks provision."Because 
the background-check measure is the centerpiece of this legislation it is 
critical that we know what is in the bill before we vote 
on it," Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Ted Cruz, R-Texas; and Mike Lee, 
R-Utah, said in a statement. "The American people expect more and deserve 
better."Thursday's vote follows an intense week of lobbying by gun control 
advocates, including the families of the victims of the December mass shooting 
at Sandy Hook Element
at."We've 
struck the right balance," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the committee's 
chairman. "It's 100 percent voluntary. There are no big mandates in this 
bill, and industry says under these conditions they think they can share 
(information), and the government can give them information that might protect 
them."The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, is widely 
backed by industry groups that say businesses are struggling to defend against 
aggressive and sophisticated attacks from hackers in China, Russia and Eastern 
Europe.Privacy and civil liberties groups have long opposed the bill because 
they say it opens America's commercial records to the federal government 
without putting a civilian agency in charge, such as the Homeland Security 
Department or Commerce Department. That leaves open the possibility that 
the National Security Agency or another military or intelligence office 
would become involved, they said. While the new program would be intended 
to transmit only technical threat data, opponents said they worried that 
personal information could be passed along, too.Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff 
of California and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois were the lone dissenters. At 
a press conference, they said they would push for amendments on the 
House floor next week that would specifically bar the military from taking 
a central role in data collection and instead put the Homeland Security 
Department in charge. They also 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20131028/d39eb8b8/attachment-0001.htm