[Abel-tasman] Find Someone Special in Your Area on eHarmony
eHarmony.com Partner
eHarmony.comPartner at uhsamaudx.com
Mon Sep 9 16:10:43 CEST 2013
Your Matches are Waiting - Review for Free!
http://www.uhsamaudx.com/2181/120/244/1050/2220.10tt62883642AAF33.php
Unsub- http://www.uhsamaudx.com/2181/120/244/1050/2220.10tt62883642AAF18.html
uffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that
the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially
punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned
their lives accordingly."The proposed law also would have set limits on
the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support
from an ex-spouse.The bill would have made it harder to get alimony
in short-term marriages. And it would have prevented alimony payments from
lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.It also would
have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children
absent extraordinary circumstances."I'm actually surprised," said Jason
Marks, a divorce attorney in Miami, about the veto. The bill had
passed the House 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. The
Senate approved it 29-11."My assumption is, you haven't heard the last of
it," Marks said. "Most family law practitioners will agree that uniformity
in determination of alimony is a good thing."The bill said that in
a short-term marriage, defined as less than 11 years, the assumption is
that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony were granted, it would
not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.For marriages
that last between 11 and 20 years, there's no assumption either way
in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than
35 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.And in marria
nd his allies insisted that the momentum in
the civil war is now in their favor and that the world's
reluctance to intervene in the conflict is more evidence that the Assad
regime is regaining its hold on the country.Obama signaled Tuesday he would
consider U.S. military action against Syria if "hard, effective evidence"
is found to bolster intelligence that chemical weapons have been used in
the civil war. Damascus has denied it has used chemical weapons, saying
the Syrian rebels are trying to frame the regime.The U.S. has provided
humanitarian aid to the Syrians and helped bolster the defenses along the
borders in neighboring Turkey and Jordan, but has preferred to let other
nations send in more lethal assistance.A key obstacle in the debate over
providing weapons has been U.S. concerns that any U.S. weapons would end
up in the hands of Al Qaeda-linked groups helping the Syrian opposition
or any of the other extremist groups in the region, such as
Lebanon-based Hezbollah.Last month, the head of the extremist Jabhat al-Nusra
group, one of the most powerful and effective rebel groups in Syria,
pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. U.S. officials
say that since then they have seen anecdotal evidence and intelligence assessments
that suggest that al-Nusra's gains within Syria have slowed, both because
of the group's public links to Al Qaeda and the U.S. designation
of al-Nusra as a terrorist organization. Other oppositi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20130909/3ea437e1/attachment.htm
More information about the Abel-tasman
mailing list