[Abel-tasman] Go solar this summer

[Summer rebates]

Man sells power back to utility company

http://www.paeglestndrucie.com/2231/141/303/1196/2552.10tt62883642AAF9.php






Unsub- http://www.paeglestndrucie.com/2231/141/303/1196/2552.10tt62883642AAF10.html











n, was exposed decades later 
as a hoax.And despite countless searches for the Loch Ness monster using 
everything from submarines to sonar, no evidence has ever appeared of the 
mythical beast except a handful of dubious photos and videos. Nonetheless, 
the legend of Loch Ness now one of Scotland's biggest tourist draws 
refuses to die.Not everyone, however, believes in lake monsters, and critics 
wonder if this latest sighting is just a college stunt."There are several 
inconsistencies with the video that point to it being a set-up," the 
Belfast Telegraph reports."The uploader claims the video was taken in Lough 
Foyle, but the landmass in the background is clearly that of Howth 
about 130 miles away from Lough Foyle," according to the Telegraph."When 
viewed at higher definitions, there are several tethering cables seen off 
the second boat, which raises further questions," the Telegraph reports.And 
several observers have cast doubt on the video simply due to the 
college student's name: "Conall Melarkey."Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a 
TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be 
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.								
												
		11 lost civilizations and how they might have fallen		
												
								11 mysteries attributed to 
aliens
get said many 
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable 
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine 
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards 
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The 
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with 
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between 
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's 
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far 
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5 
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all 
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those 
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often 
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits 
of additional reductions "speculative."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20130913/c22f4d72/attachment.htm