[Abel-tasman] Obama Announces HARP Extension Until 2015. Start Saving Today. 62883642

Harp Program HarpProgram at mfbatiwillis.us
Tue Apr 8 18:10:10 CEST 2014


The President has Waived the Refi Requirement. Save Thousands

http://www.mfbatiwillis.us/l/lt27F5001U218PTAGFP/504JI1695WEIWSA4055HGW10EMHEK62883642NRJS3590125461





Unsub- http://www.mfbatiwillis.us/l/lc15T5001X218XYTNVV/504UD1695MEOJKW4055IEX10RMUWC62883642EBMS3590125461













July 1, 2003: The South Carolina State House in Columbia is shown.APThe 
Supreme Court may have ruled ObamaCare is constitutional, but implementing 
the controversial federal law would become a crime in South Carolina if 
a bill passed by the state House becomes law.The bill, approved Wednesday 
by a vote of 65-39, declares President Obama's signature legislation "null 
and void." Whereas the law that Obama pushed and Congress passed is 
known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, South Carolina's 
law would be known as the Freedom of Health Care Protection Act.It 
would prohibit state officials and employees from "enforcing or attempting 
to enforce such unconstitutional laws" and "establish criminal penalties 
and civil liability" for those who engage in activities that aid the 
implementation of ObamaCare.The Supreme Court ruled last year that ObamaCare's 
underlying provision, requiring all Americans to obtain health insurance, 
is constitutional, though lawsuits still are pending that argue against 
certain parts of that mandate -- in particular, contraceptive coverage, 
which some Christian employers argue violates their religious beliefs.In 
South Carolina, the nullification bill would allow the state attorney general 
to take action against anyone causing harm by the implementation of ObamaCare. 
It proceeds to the state Senate for committee review, according to The 
Washington Times.Gov. Nikki Haley has rejected the expansion of Medica
ather the result of the fog of war, or something like 
it. An inquest would be conducted. The bottom of this would be 
gotten to.The slow walk was on.Romney subsequently shied from the subject. 
The one time he made mention of the attack in a debate 
with Obama, the president caught him on a technicality and moderator Candy 
Crowley of CNN helped to humiliate the former Massachusetts governor.The 
press, mostly either cowed or uninterested on the subject, let the issue 
drop too. Obama's strategy was successful. Political disaster was averted. 
Cue the confetti.But having been re-elected, the election strategy re: Benghazi 
is causing something of a hangover for the president.Now that we have 
had the first large-scale terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, public 
anxiety about Islamists and terrorism is way up. With that backdrop, Republicans 
are re-opening the inquest into the Benghazi attacks. This time the questions 
aren't so much about non-existent riots or why Americans in an Islamist 
country weren't on higher alert.This time it's about allegations of a cover-up. 
Did Obama officials muzzle critics in service of the president's re-election 
goal? Was the inquest full and fair? What did the president know, 
and when did he know it?Given it all to do over again, 
Obama likely would repeat his pre-election approach to Benghazi: denounce 
critics, go slow and minimize any broader significance of the attack. After 
all, he did win a second term.But

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20140408/b0652861/attachment.htm


More information about the Abel-tasman mailing list