[Abel-tasman] ***SPAM*** Grow More in Love Everyday

[Valentine's Day From Lines:]

Wow her! Valentine’s Day bouquets, just $19.99.

http://www.smlonogv.us/4037/9/557/540/3654.10tt62883642AAF25.php






Unsub- http://www.smlonogv.us/4037/9/557/540/3654.10tt62883642AAF26.html













April 10, 2013: A rack of AR-15 rifles stand to be individually 
packaged as workers move a pallet of rifles for shipment at the 
Stag Arms company in New Britain, Conn.APNEW BRITAIN, Conn.  A Connecticut 
gun-maker announced on Wednesday it intends to leave the state, just six 
days after passage of restrictive gun control legislation, while two other 
manufacturers said they are considering relocation offers from other states.Manufacturers 
also plan to lobby the state's congressional delegation next week "to make 
sure they hear from our side," said Mark Malkowski, president of Stag 
Arms in New Britain.Bristol-based PTR said in a statement posted on its 
website that it has not decided where it will move, but has 
commitments from most employees to relocate. The company makes military-style 
rifles and employs more than 40 people. PTR Vice President John McNamara 
said the company expects to make a more formal announcement about a 
move within six weeks."Along with other companies in the trade, we were 
deeply apprehensive at the hurried process to develop new gun laws and 
fearful that it would generate unintended consequences for our industry," 
the company said.With the legislation signed into law by Gov. Dannel P. 
Malloy on April 4, "our worst fears were confirmed," the company said. 
"What emerged was a bill fraught with ambiguous definitions, insufficient 
considerations for the trade, conflicting mandates and disastrous consequences 
for the fu
ort the 
efforts to clarify current laws to prevent any delays in disclosing this 
information in cases of missing children, which includes persons under age 
21 under federal law."Debra Lewis, a spokeswoman for Verizon, said the phone 
carrier supports the Smiths in their effort to pass the bill, but 
declined to comment further on the legislation.Groups like the American 
Civil Liberties Union say proposals such as Kelseys Law raise some privacy 
concerns.The major one is that it removes a check on when law 
enforcement can access this type of information, Chris Calabrese, legislative 
counsel for the ACLU, told FoxNews.com.An emergency cant be a magic word 
 where all police have to do is say emergency and cellphone 
companies release information, he said.While Calabrese acknowledged that 
the vast majority of calls by local police are legitimate emergencies, many 
have also been proven not to be.People want companies to safeguard their 
information and this removes their discretion to do that, he said.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://post.in-mind.de/pipermail/abel-tasman/attachments/20140207/29f82bda/attachment-0001.htm