<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/1392/2870.10tt62883642AAF1.php"><H3>See why the end of Barack Obama may be near</a></H3></strong>
<p><strong>Below is a message from one of our paid sponsors, Stansberry & Associates Research:</strong><br />
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/1392/2870.10tt62883642AAF2.php" target="_blank">THE END OF BARACK OBAMA? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/1392/2870.10tt62883642AAF3.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/62883642/1392.2870/img017137143.jpg" width="600" height="800" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 18px"><font size="small">Dear Subscriber, </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">Here’s something I definitely recommend you check out… </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">Porter Stansberry is the founder of Stansberry Research. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">And recently, Porter has done some fascinating research. He says there’s an approaching BIG event in America, which could entirely ruin Barack Obama’s Presidency. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">Now I know at first glance this probably sounds a little outrageous. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">But keep in mind, that’s exactly how many people felt a few years back, when Porter predicted the collapse of General Motors, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ganett Newspapers, just to name a few. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">The point is, Porter has a remarkable track record when it comes to this type of work. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">So I strongly encourage you to at least take a quick look at the research he’s done. Because even if he’s only half right, this big event will have a dramatic impact not only on Barack Obama, but also you, me, and everyone else in this country. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">We’ve posted Porter’s full analysis on our website. You can access it free of charge, <a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/1392/2870.10tt62883642AAF4.php" target="_blank">here</a>. </font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">Sincerely,</font><br />
<br />
<font size="small">George Rayburn</font><br />
<font size="small">Publisher, S&A Research</font></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/1392/2870.10tt62883642AAF5.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a></p>
<p><br />
LBW<br />
6710 Professional Pkwy West #201<br />
Sarasota FL 34240
</p>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for abel-tasman@coredump.buug.de
<br />
<a href="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/u/2656/1392/2870/10/62883642/abel-tasman@coredump.buug.de" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.fogtxlathed.us/2656/171/371/62883642/1392.2870/img117137143.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"><!--isis in Syria."President Obama has said
the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S.
position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said
last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement
or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen.
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number
one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall
into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the
question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.,
also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if
correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United
States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure
about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although
we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a
spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information
is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously,
we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of
chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is
why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation
that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac
--><!--mbers, such as Wisconsin's Paul Ryan have
been speaking out in favor of a comprehensive solution to immigration. But
unlike in the Senate, where a number of Republicans have begun to
embrace far-reaching immigration legislation as a necessary remedy for a
Republican Party that has struggled to maintain support from Hispanic voters,
many Republican House members represent districts where Latino voters aren't
a significant factor.Supporters of immigration legislation believe that
the best way to pressure the House to act would be for
the Senate to pass immigration legislation with a convincing majority including
a large number of Republican supporters. Schumer and McCain predicted just
that outcome Thursday, saying they hoped for support from a majority of
Republican senators in addition to a majority of Democrats."I think it's
very doable," McCain said.Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy,
D-Vt., said Thursday that in the wake of three days of hearings
on the Senate immigration bill, his committee will begin to amend and
vote on the legislation May 9. Action on the Senate floor may
come in June. The bill would secure the border, usher in new
work visa programs for high- and low-skilled workers, require employers
to verify workers' legal status and put immigrants living here illegally
on a 13-year path to citizenship.Despite Goodlatte's preference for breaking
immigration up into multiple bills, a bipartisan group in the Hous
--></p>
</html>