<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/1408/2942.10tt62883642AAF1.php"><H3>Cordless outdoor motion sensor light</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
<tr>
<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
<p>
<a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/1408/2942.10tt62883642AAF2.php">Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/1408/2942.10tt62883642AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/62883642/1408.2942/img017438043.jpg" alt="Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light" width="320" height="533" border="0" id="body"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/1408/2942.10tt62883642AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/62883642/1408.2942/img117438043.gif" border="0"></a>
<a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/1408/2942.10tt62883642AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/62883642/1408.2942/img217438043.gif" border="0"></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for abel-tasman@coredump.buug.de
<br />
<a href="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/u/2949/1408/2942/10/62883642/abel-tasman@coredump.buug.de" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.rafieetenuptend.us/2949/174/380/62883642/1408.2942/img317438043.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">ts offered an amendment that declared climate
change to be caused by humans.The amendment said: "Congress accepts the
scientific findings of the Environmental Protection Agency that climate
changes is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant
risks for public health and welfare."That amendment failed, on a 184-240
vote -- which is where the 240 number came from in the
OFA ad.But three of those no votes were Democrats. And not all
of the Republicans who voted against the amendment are on record saying
climate change is a sham. Republicans, rather, complained at the time that
the amendment was not pertinent to the underlying bill.So where does the
word "hoax" come from?There appear to be a couple instances. One, according
to the Post, was from a Democrat, Rep. Henry Waxman, who said
at the time that the Republican bill's premise was "that climate change
is a hoax."The other was a quote from Republican Georgia Rep. Paul
Broun, nestled into the Obama group's video right after the vote factoid.
Broun said: "The idea of human-induced global climate change is one of
the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community. It is a
hoax."But as FactCheck.org pointed out, that quote was from 2009, two years
earlier.FactCheck.org also said that Broun and other Republicans who completely
deny a link to human activity are "off base." But the group
noted there is a diversity of opinion among the GOP caucus on
t
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
</p>
</html>