<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head><center><a href="http://www.nowtimetoget.eu/1913/305/550/4215/6734.12tt33823536AAF1.php">Lower your Mortgage Payment!
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan='2' align='center' valign='middle' class='preview-mid'>
<br>
<center>
<a href="http://www.nowtimetoget.eu/1913/305/550/4215/6734.12tt33823536AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.nowtimetoget.eu/1913/305/550/33823536/4215.6734/img030555049.gif" border="0" alt=""></a>
</center>
<div align="center">
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br>
If you'd prefer not to receive future emails, <a href="http://www.nowtimetoget.eu/1913/305/550/4215/6734.12tt33823536AAF2.html"><font color="#666666">Unsubscribe Here</font></a>.<br>
4859 W Slauson Ave, #405, Los Angeles, CA 90056</font>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><font color="#FFFFFF">get said many
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits
of additional reductions "speculative."
</font>
</body>
</html>