[spectre] spectres partially uncovered?

[Diana McCarty]

Hello all, 

So the real spectre is privacy protection! Honor, if you are willing to
take the time, I'd suggest doing something along the lines of posting
the names of all the subscribers. If that is not included in the info
provided to subscribe, how about the people on the list send a mail, 
off list to you for this purpose. Of course, this is a lot of work.
If people are willing to send their names, they might also want to
include urls to give some idea of what they do.

ciao, 

diana



> > >if the subscriber list will be published, here is a suggestion: to publish
> > >only names [real / artistic / institutional / corporate / split / multiple
> > >personalities ...] with no e-mail addresses ... [no spam guaranteed!]
> 
> i don't think spectre collects this information.  if they did, this would
> obviously be the most sensible thing to distribute.
> as far as i know, no-one has this data centralised .
> i understood that when you subscribe to spectre, you simply supply an email
> address.
> andreas? inke?
> 
> the list of subscribers' partial email addresses may have to do for
> now.  at least people can look at the list and have a small sense of who is
> on the list.
> i'll be sending it out tomorrow at about noon GMT.  if anyone wants me to
> omit their partial edress from the posting, let me know :)
> 
> .hh
> 
> ______________________________________________
> SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
> Info, archive and help:
> http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre