[spectre] Susan Sontag on WTC and Anerica
Jeremy Welsh
jeremy.welsh@khib.no
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:34:23 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------6EAA1B419B94B5C5C5B1C1E4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
The following article, reported in Bergense Tidende today (24 sept) was
published in The New Yorker magazine last week. Susan Sontag takes issue
with the American media & establishment over its portrayal of recent
events.
The
disconnect between last Tuesday's monstrous
dose
of reality and the self-righteous drivel and
outright deceptions being peddled by public figures
and TV
commentators is startling, depressing. The
voices
licensed to follow the event seem to have
joined
together in a campaign to infantilize the
public. Where is the acknowledgment that this was
not a
"cowardly" attack on "civilization" or
"liberty" or "humanity" or "the free world" but an
attack
on the world's self-proclaimed superpower,
undertaken as a consequence of specific American
alliances and actions? How many citizens are aware
of the
ongoing American bombing of Iraq? And if
the
word "cowardly" is to be used, it might be more
aptly
applied to those who kill from beyond the
range
of retaliation, high in the sky, than to those
willing to die themselves in order to kill others. In
the
matter of courage (a morally neutral virtue):
whatever may be said of the perpetrators of
Tuesday's slaughter, they were not cowards.
Our
leaders are bent on convincing us that
everything is O.K. America is not afraid. Our spirit
is
unbroken, although this was a day that will live
in
infamy and America is now at war. But
everything is not O.K. And this was not Pearl
Harbor. We have a robotic President who assures us
that
America still stands tall. A wide spectrum of
public
figures, in and out of office, who are
strongly opposed to the policies being pursued
abroad
by this Administration apparently feel free
to say
nothing more than that they stand united
behind
President Bush. A lot of thinking needs to
be
done, and perhaps is being done in Washington
and
elsewhere, about the ineptitude of American
intelligence and counter-intelligence, about options
available to American foreign policy, particularly
in the
Middle East, and about what constitutes a
smart
program of military defense. But the public is
not
being asked to bear much of the burden of
reality. The unanimously applauded,
self-congratulatory bromides of a Soviet Party
Congress seemed contemptible. The unanimity of
the
sanctimonious, reality-concealing rhetoric
spouted by American officials and media
commentators in recent days seems, well, unworthy
of a
mature democracy.
Those
in public office have let us know that they
consider their task to be a manipulative one:
confidence-building and grief management.
Politics, the politics of a democracy—which entails
disagreement, which promotes candor—has been
replaced by psychotherapy. Let's by all means
grieve
together. But let's not be stupid together. A
few
shreds of historical awareness might help us
understand what has just happened, and what may
continue to happen. "Our country is strong," we are
told
again and again. I for one don't find this
entirely consoling. Who doubts that America is
strong? But that's not all America has to be.
—Susan
Sontag
--------------6EAA1B419B94B5C5C5B1C1E4
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="jw.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Jeremy Welsh
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jw.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Welsh;Jeremy
tel;cell:+47 922 63 701
tel;work:+47 55 58 74 86
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:jw@khib.no
x-mozilla-cpt:;3
fn:Jeremy Welsh
end:vcard
--------------6EAA1B419B94B5C5C5B1C1E4--