[spectre] Punishment by detail: Edward Said
JSalloum@aol.com
JSalloum@aol.com
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:00:14 EDT
Punishment by detail
Edward Said
AL-AHRAM WEEKLY 8 - 14 August 2002
=20
Aside from the obvious physical discomforts, being ill for a long
> period of time fills the spirit with a terrible feeling of
> helplessness, but also with periods of analytic lucidity, which, of
> course, must be treasured. For the past three months now I have been
> in and out of the hospital, with days marked by lengthy and painful
> treatments, blood transfusions, endless tests, hours and hours of
> unproductive time spent staring at the ceiling, draining fatigue and
> infection, inability to do normal work, and thinking, thinking,
> thinking. But there are also the intermittent passages of lucidity and
> reflection that sometimes give the mind a perspective on daily life
> that allows it to see things (without being able to do much about
> them) from a different perspective.
>=20
> Reading the news from Palestine and seeing the frightful images of
> death and destruction on television, it has been my experience to be
> utterly amazed and aghast at what I have deduced from those details
> about Israeli government policy, more particularly about what has been
> going on in the mind of Ariel Sharon. And when, after the recent Gaza
> bombing by one of his F-16s in which nine children were massacred, he
> was quoted as congratulating the pilot and boasting of a great Israeli
> success, I was able to form a much clearer idea than before of what a
> pathologically deranged mind is capable of, not only in terms of what
> it plans and orders but, worse, how it manages to persuade other minds
> to think in the same delusional and criminal way. Getting inside the
> official Israeli mind is a worthwhile, if lurid, experience.
>=20
> In the West, however, there's been such repetitious and unedifying
> attention paid to Palestinian suicide bombing that a gross distortion
> in reality has completely obscured what is much worse: the official
> Israeli, and perhaps the uniquely Sharonian evil that has been visited
> so deliberately and so methodically on the Palestinian people. Suicide
> bombing is reprehensible but it is a direct and, in my opinion, a
> consciously programmed result of years of abuse, powerlessness and
> despair. It has as little to do with the Arab or Muslim supposed
> propensity for violence as the man in the moon. Sharon wants
> terrorism, not peace, and he does everything in his power to create
> the conditions for it. But for all its horror, Palestinian violence,
> the response of a desperate and horribly oppressed people, has been
> stripped of its context and the terrible suffering from which it
> arises: a failure to see that is a failure in humanity, which doesn't
> make it any less terrible but at least situates it in a real history
> and real geography.
>=20
> Yet the location of Palestinian terror -- of course it is terror -- is
> never allowed a moment's chance to appear, so remorseless has been the
> focus on it as a phenomenon apart, a pure, gratuitous evil which
> Israel, supposedly acting on behalf of pure good, has been virtuously
> battling in its variously appalling acts of disproportionate violence
> against a population of three million Palestinian civilians. I am not
> speaking only about Israel's manipulation of opinion, but its
> exploitation of the American equivalent of the campaign against
> terrorism without which Israel could not have done what it has done.
> (In fact, I cannot think of any other country on earth that, in full
> view of nightly TV audiences, has performed such miracles of detailed
> sadism against an entire society and gotten away with it.) That this
> evil has been made consciously part of George W Bush's campaign
> against terrorism, irrationally magnifying American fantasies and
> fixations with extraordinary ease, is no small part of its blind
> destructiveness. Like the brigades of eager (and in my opinion
> completely corrupt) American intellectuals who spin enormous
> structures of falsehoods about the benign purpose and necessity of US
> imperialism, Israeli society has pressed into service numerous
> academics, policy intellectuals at think tanks, and ex-military men
> now in defence-related and public relations business, all to
> rationalise and make convincing inhuman punitive policies that are
> supposedly based on the need for Israeli security.
>=20
> Israeli security is now a fabled beast. Like a unicorn it is endlessly
> hunted and never found, remaining, everlastingly, the goal of future
> action. That over time Israel has become less secure and more
> unacceptable to its neighbours scarcely merits a moment's notice. But
> then who challenges the view that Israeli security ought to define the
> moral world we live in? Certainly not the Arab and Palestinian
> leaderships who for 30 years have conceded everything to Israeli
> security. Shouldn't that ever be questioned, given that Israel has
> wreaked more damage on the Palestinians and other Arabs relative to
> its size than any country in the world, Israel with its nuclear
> arsenal, its air force, navy, and army limitlessly supplied by the US
> taxpayer? As a result the daily, minute occurrences of what
> Palestinians have to live through are hidden and, more important,
> covered over by a logic of self-defence and the pursuit of terrorism
> (terrorist infrastructure, terrorist nests, terrorist bomb factories,
> terrorist suspects -- the list is infinite) which perfectly suits
> Sharon and the lamentable George Bush. Ideas about terrorism have thus
> taken on a life of their own, legitimised and re-legitimised without
> proof, logic or rational argument.
>=20
> Consider for instance the devastation of Afghanistan, on the one hand,
> and the "targeted" assassinations of almost 100 Palestinians (to say
> nothing of many thousands of "suspects" rounded-up and still
> imprisoned by Israeli soldiers) on the other: nobody asks whether all
> these people killed were in fact terrorists, or proved to be
> terrorists, or were about to become terrorists. They are all assumed
> to be dangers by acts of simple, unchallenged affirmation. All you
> need is an arrogant spokesman or two, like the loutish Ranaan Gissin,
> Avi Pazner, or Dore Gold, and in Washington a non-stop apologist for
> ignorance and incoherence like Ari Fleisher, and the targets in
> question are just as good as dead. Without doubts, questions, or
> demurral. No need for proof or any such tiresome delicacy. Terrorism
> and its obsessive pursuit have become an entirely circular,
> self-fulfilling murder and slow death of enemies who have no choice or
> say in the matter.
>=20
> With the exception of reports by a few intrepid journalists and
> writers such as Amira Hass, Gideon Levy, Amos Elon, Tanya Leibowitz,
> Jeff Halper, Israel Shamir and a few others, public discourse in the
> Israeli media has declined terribly in quality and honesty. Patriotism
> and blind support for the government has replaced skeptical reflection
> and moral seriousness. Gone are the days of Israel Shahak, Jakob
> Talmon, and Yehoshua Leibowitch. I can think of few Israeli academics
> and intellectuals -- men like Zeev Sternhell, Uri Avneri, and Ilan
> Pappe, for instance -- who are courageous enough to depart from the
> imbecilic and debased debate about "security" and "terrorism" that
> seems to have overtaken the Israeli peace establishment, or even its
> rapidly dwindling Left opposition. Crimes are being committed every
> day in the name of Israel and the Jewish people, and yet the
> intellectuals chatter on about strategic withdrawal, or perhaps
> whether to incorporate settlements or not, or whether to keep building
> that monstrous fence (has a crazier idea ever been realised in the
> modern world, that you can put several million people in a cage and
> say they don't exist?) in a manner befitting a general or a
> politician, rather than in ways more suited to intellectuals and
> artists with independent judgment and some sort of moral standard.
> Where are the Israeli equivalents of Nadine Gordimer, Andre Brink,
> Athol Fugard, those white writers who spoke out unequivocally and with
> unambiguous clarity against the evils of South African apartheid? They
> simply don't exist in Israel, where public discourse by writers and
> academics has sunk to equivocation and the repetition of official
> propaganda, and where most really first-class writing and thought has
> disappeared from even the academic establishment.
>=20
> But to return to Israeli practices and the mind-set that has gripped
> the country with such obduracy during the past few years, think of
> Sharon's plan. It entails nothing less than the obliteration of an
> entire people by slow, systematic methods of suffocation, outright
> murder, and the stifling of everyday life. There is a remarkable story
> by Kafka, In the Penal Colony, about a crazed official who shows off a
> fantastically detailed torture machine whose purpose is to write all
> over the body of the victim, using a complex apparatus of needles to
> inscribe the captive's body with minute letters that ultimately causes
> the prisoner to bleed to death. This is what Sharon and his brigades
> of willing executioners are doing to the Palestinians, with only the
> most limited and most symbolic of opposition. Every Palestinian has
> become a prisoner. Gaza is surrounded by an electrified wire fence on
> three sides; imprisoned like animals, Gazans are unable to move,
> unable to work, unable to sell their vegetables or fruit, unable to go
> to school. They are exposed from the air to Israeli planes and
> helicopters and are gunned down like turkeys on the ground by tanks
> and machine guns. Impoverished and starved, Gaza is a human nightmare,
> each of whose little pieces of episodes -- like what takes place at
> Erez, or near the settlements -- involves thousands of soldiers in the
> humiliation, punishment, intolerable enfeeblement of each Palestinian,
> without regard for age, gender, or illness. Medical supplies are held
> up at the border, ambulances are fired upon or detained. Hundreds of
> houses demolished, and hundreds of thousands of trees and agricultural
> land destroyed in acts of systematic collective punishment against
> civilians, most of whom are already refugees from Israel's destruction
> of their society in 1948. Hope has been eliminated from the
> Palestinian vocabulary so that only raw defiance remains, and still
> Sharon and his sadistic minions prattle on about eliminating terrorism
> by an ever-encroaching occupation that has continued now for 35 years.
> That the campaign itself is, like all colonial brutality, futile, or
> that it has the effect of making Palestinians more, rather than less,
> defiant simply does not enter Sharon's closed mind.
>=20
> The West Bank is occupied by 1,000 Israeli tanks whose sole purpose is
> to fire upon and terrorise civilians. Curfews are imposed for periods
> of up to two weeks, without respite. Schools and universities are
> either closed or impossible to get to. No one can travel, not just
> between the nine main cities, but within the cities. Every town today
> is a wasteland of destroyed buildings, looted offices, purposely
> ruined water and electrical systems. Commerce is finished.
> Malnutrition prevails in half the number of children. Two thirds of
> the population lives below the poverty level of $2 a day. Tanks in
> Jenin (where the demolition of the refugee camp by Israeli armour, a
> major war crime, was never investigated because cowardly international
> bureaucrats such as Kofi Annan back down when Israel threatens) fire
> upon and kill children, but that is only one drop in an unending
> stream of Palestinian civilian deaths caused by Israeli soldiers who
> furnish the illegal Israeli military occupation with loyal,
> unquestioning service. Palestinians are all "terrorist suspects".
>=20
> The soul of this occupation is that young Israeli conscripts are
> allowed full rein to subject Palestinians at check-points to every
> known form of private torture and abjection. There is the waiting in
> the sun for hours; then there is the detention of medical supplies and
> produce until they rot; there are the insulting words and beatings
> administered at will; the sudden rampage of jeeps and soldiers against
> civilians waiting their turn by the thousands at the innumerable check
> points that have made of Palestinian life a choking hell; making
> dozens of youths kneel in the sun for hours; forcing men to take off
> their clothes; insulting and humiliating parents in front of their
> children; forbidding the sick to pass through for no other reason than
> personal whim; stopping ambulances and firing on them. And the steady
> number of Palestinian deaths (quadruple that of Israelis) increases on
> a daily, mostly untabulated basis. More "terrorist suspects" plus
> their wives and children, but "we" regret those deaths very much.
> Thank you.
>=20
> Israel is frequently referred to as a democracy. If so, then it is a
> democracy without a conscience, a country whose soul has been captured
> by a mania for punishing the weak, a democracy that faithfully mirrors
> the psychopathic mentality of its ruler, General Sharon, whose sole
> idea -- if that is the right word for it -- is to kill, reduce, maim,
> drive away Palestinians until "they break". He provides nothing more
> concrete as a goal for his campaigns, now or in the past, beyond that,
> and like the garrulous official in Kafka's story he is most proud of
> his machine for abusing defenceless Palestinian civilians, all the
> while monstrously abetted in his grotesque lies by his court advisers
> and philosophers and generals, as well as by his chorus of faithful
> American servants. There is no Palestinian army of occupation, no
> Palestinian tanks, no soldiers, no helicopter gun-ships, no artillery,
> no government to speak of. But there are the "terrorists" and the
> "violence" that Israel has invented so that its own neuroses can be
> inscribed on the bodies of Palestinians, without effective protest
> from the overwhelming majority of Israel's laggard philosophers,
> intellectuals, artists, peace activists. Palestinian schools,
> libraries and universities have ceased normal functioning for months
> now: and we still wait for the Western freedom-to-write-groups and the
> vociferous defenders of academic freedom in America to raise their
> voices in protest. I have yet to see one academic organisation either
> in Israel or in the West make a declaration about this profound
> abrogation of the Palestinian right to knowledge, to learning, to
> attend school.
>=20
> In sum, Palestinians must die a slow death so that Israel can have its
> security, which is just around the corner but cannot be realised
> because of the special Israeli "insecurity". The whole world must
> sympathise, while the cries of Palestinian orphans, sick old women,
> bereaved communities, and tortured prisoners simply go unheard and
> unrecorded. Doubtless, we will be told, these horrors serve a larger
> purpose than mere sadistic cruelty. After all, "the two sides" are
> engaged in a "cycle of violence" which has to be stopped, sometime,
> somewhere. Once in a while, we ought to pause and declare indignantly
> that there is only side with an army and a country: the other is a
> stateless dispossessed population of people without rights or any
> present way of securing them. The language of suffering and concrete
> daily life has either been hijacked, or it has been so perverted as,
> in my opinion, to be useless except as pure fiction deployed as a
> screen for the purpose of more killing and painstaking torture --
> slowly, fastidiously, inexorably. That is the truth of what
> Palestinians suffer. But in any case, Israeli policy will ultimately
> fail.
>=20
>=20
> =A9 Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
> www.ahram.org.eg/weekly
> Updated every Saturday at 11.00 GMT, 2pm local time
> weeklyweb@ahram.org.eg Al-Ahram Organisation
>=20