[spectre] Fwd: Re: 2 wr[b]yte

[_dream.thick[ener]_]

>At 07:08 AM 9/10/2005, fwrote:
>
>>1. Etymologically, "to write" means: to tear, scratch, cut.
>
>_cognition_actions>gestured_n.scriptions_+_[purposeful]balances_
>
>=
>
>_taw[t(h)or]ny_furred poetics.
>
>have.u.ever.seen.crow.poetry?
>[masked.in.activity.caw[l]ings]
>
>
>>Thus "to write"
>>points to the basic cut (or the differentiation) that makes a difference,
>>that in-forms by creating information, meaning, sense.
>
>
>_again[st.all.covert.ezy.formulatary]||action_
>_differentiation.of.cellular.lvl.text.spawned+jumbled.thru.x.p[oetry.reg]ression.lotteries_
>
>[Insertion of 
>Current.Statement.of.Dialogical.M(funeral.meaning).Pyre(s+damaged)N.tent(s)]:
>
>*i.f(t)umble.+.s(addened+black_ball_f(etal)iltered)ojourn.here*
>*list.bound(aried.in.a.s.trapped.wurd.straight.jacket*
>*a(i)ching.typewritten.mouth(ings).deafmute.stretched.thru.bad.formatting*
>*mp_ty.silence.moderat[h]or[goddishly_like].gaps_n.d(e)uce.incomprehensions*
>
>>Or with George
>>Spencer Brown: "Draw a distinction, and you create a universe."
>
>_D.Raw[l]ing.torn.bleeding.thru.proactivity>oth[ub]erness.m.braced+m.pathy.ack.no.ledged_
>
>
>>Thus, when I
>>think about 'digital writing' I have to do with a doubled or better: a
>>self-referential notion.
>
>_self_rif.f[lings+ego=arrowings]>construction_ripplings_
>
>>Aesthetically, digital writing - for me - is
>>concerned with the processes, conditions and potential of writing in its
>>pure sense.
>
>
>processes
>conditions
>potentionals
>*
>playfulness>processes.not.tied.with.rubber.conventionality.strings
>v[-conditions]>context*context[devote.meandering.minus.a.canons.s(info)tainment]
>potentials>sighing.the.good.decency||empathy|\tendency.[silent.texted]smiles
>
>
>- 
>01---------------------------

_intricate mirror mem[e_st]ories_
_ch[str]ained+[D-fence]linked_
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/


                      .