[spectre] HAARP -it is to say Haarp?

[Mathias Hohmann]

or alternative sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP
http://www.haarp.com/main.html (2002)
http://www.earthpulse.com/src/category.asp?catid=1 (1996)

Ewen Chardronnet wrote:

> have a look at the official website
>
> http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
>
> Louise Desrenards a écrit :
>
>> J'ai suivi un lien dans le site de elli medeiros
>>
>> http://www.ellimedeiros.com/logz/journal/
>>
>> et je suis tombée sur le projet Harrp - enfin pas un projet une 
>> réalité...
>>
>> Alors j'ai cherché davantage dans google:
>> http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=harrp&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=
>>
>> et j'ai trouvé toutes sortes de choses dont aussi ce lien:
>>
>> http://www.geocities.com/jilaens/haarp.html
>>
>> Je cite intégralement :
>>
>> UFO Reality Interview
>>
>> Jilaen Sherwood Interviews Dr Nick Begich on HAARP
>>
>> Dr Nick Begich reveals the frightening truth behind the United States'
>> latest black technology project.
>>
>> JS: Can you tell me a little bit about your background?
>>
>> NB: I was born and raised in Alaska. I was a Senator and President of 
>> the
>> Confederation of Teachers for
>> two terms, and President of the Council of Education for two terms. I 
>> have a
>> doctorate in traditional medicine.
>>
>> JS: How long have you been researching the HAARP project?
>>
>> NB: I began in early 1994. My co-author, Jean Manning, had started 
>> her work
>> in this area around 1991.We became acquainted after I had published 
>> my first
>> major article in Nexus, in Australia, and it was published in the 
>> summer of
>> 1994. From that article we were contacted by a number of people, 
>> including
>> Jean Manning.
>>
>> JS: What does HAARP actually stand for?
>>
>> NB: It stands for High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program
>>
>> JS: What is the purpose of the program ?
>>
>> NB: It's a project being managed by the US Air Force and Navy for the
>> purpose of what they describe as upper atmospheric research. The 
>> reality of
>> it is this is a proto type, which they acknowledge as a prototype, 
>> basically
>> to develop Tesla-type technologies..
>>
>> JS: So, it's like Star Wars?
>>
>> NB: Absolutely. At the very end of the Presidential election in this 
>> last
>> cycle Doyle raised the issue of Star Wars again, and in the raising 
>> of this
>> issue he mentioned a couple of things that are relevant. First of all he
>> said that the cost of Star Wars had gone down significantly, and 
>> second that
>> the reason the cost had gone down
>> significantly was because Star Wars was essentially comprised of four
>> ground-based systems augmented by satellites, and HAARP was providing 
>> some
>> of that research for those ground-based systems.
>>
>> JS: In your opinion what will the Star Wars weapons system be used for?
>>
>> NB: What they describe in the military is a 'number of things'. The 
>> first
>> thing they talk about is communication
>> with submarines, and the idea in this application is by sending a radio
>> frequency signal, which is what HAARP produces, of a very high power 
>> Which
>> can cause the ionosphere - which is an area about 30 miles above the 
>> Earth's
>> surface and is a protective layer from the sun - they can cause it to
>> vibrate. It sends them a returning signal which penetrates the Earth and
>> sea, which they can use for communicating with submarines.
>>
>> They can also use it for ground-penetrating tomography which is 
>> currently
>> funding the United States Congressional Project, and this abdication 
>> of, if
>> you will, X-raying the Earth, or looking into the Earth several 
>> kilometers
>> deep for underground facilities, shelters, geologic strata differentials
>> currently this particular use has proven to be effective. Beyond that it
>> deals with over-the-horizon radar technologies; looking around the 
>> curvature
>> of the Earth; and for detected incoming objects. They can also 
>> distinguish
>> which of those incoming objects carry nuclear payloads. They can also
>> disable those objects with the same system that detected
>> , so it becomes a defensive as well as an offensive weapon. Beyond 
>> that the
>> things that we have uncovered
>> in our research is how the system can be used for affecting human
>> physiology, human behaviour, as well as weather systems.
>>
>> JS: Do do you think that some of these incoming objects" might be of
>> extraterrestrial origin?
>>
>> NB: That's really out of my field, but certainly it's plausible. I 
>> mean, the
>> idea that this weapon and technology can be used against high 
>> technology I
>> think is quite probable.
>> 'Whether or not it will be, that is beyond my area of research. But 
>> it's a
>> very sophisticated
>> weapons technology. It represents a major initiative of the United 
>> States
>> military, of
>> which HAARP is just one part. I mean the whole idea of electromagnetic
>> weapons and
>> technologies is just now being talked about in the main- stream 
>> again. Our
>> research goes back to the '7Os, '8Os and look at what HAARP is as a 
>> early
>> '70s, when these weapons were first being evolved. And what has 
>> happened is
>> tat most of the evolution of these weapons was done in secrecy under 
>> what
>> are called 'black projects'.
>> HAARP is a visible representation of a very large program.
>>
>> JS: So in truth HAARP is a top-secret weapons program?
>>
>> NB: Yeah. I think the technologies that surround it really deal with 
>> some of
>> the most sophisticated weapons technologies conceived. When you research
>> facility, every weapons program begins that way. To say that HAARP is 
>> not a
>> research project would be wrong, but to say it is not a weapons 
>> project is
>> equally wrong. It is a weapons program based on early research. Where it
>> goes from here really remains to be seen, but we believe we have hit the
>> very beginnings of a very large project. The documents that we point 
>> to are
>> primarily their own - military documents, HAARP planning documents,
>> mainstream media reports and press releases that they've released 
>> about the
>> technology.
>>
>> JS: Where is the HAARP project based?
>>
>> NB: The HAARP project located ... about 150 miles northeast of 
>> Anchorage, in
>> a place called Gakona, Masks. So it is very remote, and very few 
>> people live
>> in the region. It's an area the size of, say, Connecticut, that might 
>> have
>> 5000 or 6000 people, so it is very sparsely populated.
>>
>> JS: Why is it located there? Is it because Gakona close to the pole?
>>
>> NB: Absolutely, that is a major reason it's located there. There are 
>> really
>> three criteria for locating in Alaska: one was it's closer ... to 
>> where the
>> naturally occurring magnetic lines of force intercept the Earth, which
>> happens to be at the poles; the second cnteria was that you needed large
>> supplies of fuel, natural gas being the ideal fuel source, and Alaska is
>> well-known now for its natural gas supplies; and, thirdly, the 
>> remoteness of
>> the location, while still being within the confines of the United 
>> States.
>> This is the idea when you build a weapons system. A Star Wars weapons
>> system, totally satellite-based, is very
>> vulnerable. I mean you could have accidents, you could have all kind of
>> things occur involving other countries. You could pretty well say 
>> maybe it
>> was an accident, maybe it wasn't. If you have a ground- based system on,
>> say, US soil, any country who violates that system has to really cross a
>> line tat is pretty clearly distinguished - I think that a large part 
>> of it.
>> The other part is maintaining the system. A ground-based Star Wars 
>> system to
>> maintain is much cheaper than a satellite-based system where you have 
>> to use
>> space shuttles to do service
>> work instead of a mechanic in a pick-up truck!
>>
>> Weather Modification
>>
>> JS: You mentioned that it could have an effect on the Weather
>>
>> NB: This particular effect is one that people, when you first raise the
>> question, doubt. But weapons technology in terms of weather modification
>> goes back to the l950s. In the I 970s, the middle of the '70s (1976) we
>> signed an agreement with over 60 other countries, where we agreed to 
>> not use
>> weather warfare - weather modification as a
>> weapon. The idea that we would sign that agreement over 20 years in 
>> advance
>> speaks for itself.
>> The idea of using the system for weather modification is described quite
>> clearly. The Program Manager at
>> Hanscom Air Force Base for the military has said on public television in
>> Canada that you can, and they will,
>> put holes in the ionosphere - in other words, create a lifting of the
>> ionosphere so that there is a space, and
>> the idea in creating holes in the ionosphere is that if a satellite 
>> enters
>> one of these spaces they encounter
>> an atmosphere that shouldn't be there and it causes drag forces, causes
>> satellites to malfunction, so as an anti- satellite weapon it has 
>> that use.
>> The problem is that when you create a hole, even if it is only 30 
>> miles in
>> diameter or 250 miles in diameter
>> (which is the range the military have been talking about) at 250 
>> miles high
>> what happens is that the lower atmosphere rushes in to fill this empty
>> space, and as a result wind patterns in the area underneath change. 
>> This can
>> have a dramatic effect, because it is not just a small area that is 
>> affected
>> - a large area becomes affected by these changes in weather patterns, 
>> and
>> anyone who's watched global weather maps knows that what happens in 
>> Alaska
>> effects most of Canada and the entire West Coast of the United 
>> States. The
>> flow of our weather patterns flow right through the Mid-West, so 
>> somehow to
>> view this in isolation is absolutely ridiculous. The fact is that it 
>> will
>> affect the weather patterns throughout the United States.
>>
>> JS: So this would also have quite an effect on people?
>>
>> NB: This is one of the other areas that we explored very thoroughly. We
>> viewed countless documents from the United States Air Force, also 
>> from the
>> Navy, dealing with the bio-effects, the biological effects of
>> electromagnetic weapons systems. This is a relatively new area in 
>> terms of
>> public disclosures, but it has been around a long time. The idea is 
>> that you
>> can go back to some of the older weapons that they've talked about, like
>> particle-beam weapons or laser weapons.
>> On 60 Minutes, one of the major CBS television programs, they put out a
>> 'special' last year and used a pulsed microwave for creating symptoms of
>> sea-sickness or illness in people. The most recent documents that 
>> have come
>> out on these technologies - one in particular 'New World Vistas', 
>> produced
>> by the United StatesAir Force - talks about these kinds of weapons being
>> used to affect the emotional state rather than the physiological 
>> state. What
>> we know in terms of what you can do with a pulsed microwave ... you 
>> can also
>> do with pulsed signals when they hit a certain range that biologically
>> happens to be in a very low range of power, and it was called ELF, an
>> extremely low frequency.
>> Research done in Yale University from the '60s all the way through to 
>> the
>> '8Os has demonstrated that using pulsed or electromagnetic signals 
>> you can
>> create huge chemical changes within the body that manifest either as 
>> illness
>> or behavioural change, and they would demonstrate this at Yale with 
>> animals
>> and humans - they were able to change the mental state of humans and 
>> animals
>> almost like turning on and off a light the switch, from highly 
>> agitated to
>> very passive.
>>
>> The systems have been around but what HAARP can produce, according to
>> according to its Program Managers, is energy densities approximately 
>> equal
>> to what the Earth naturally produces in the ELF range. What was shown at
>> Yale is that energy densities one-fiftieth as strong were sufficient for
>> changing the behaviour of animals, so it is fifty times more power 
>> than you
>> need within the frequency range of modeling human behaviour.
>> The question is: will it be, as John Hefiier has said, a side-effect 
>> which
>> they aren't particularly interested in, or will it be a deliberate 
>> effect?
>> We don't know the answer to that question, but the fact that it can 
>> create,
>> if you will,these side-effects or purposeful effects is highly 
>> disturbing to
>> us, because it is not disclosed in any of the environmental impact
>> statements dealing with this project. Many of these risks have now.
>>
>> There are no biological scientists on the project looking at the
>> physiological risks. Even if they had the standard biologists, if you 
>> will,
>> what they really need are people skilled in electro-physiology, 
>> people with
>> the requisite backgrounds dealing with electromagnetic effects on 
>> humans.
>> They are available to the military but they are not on the program, 
>> and they
>> should be on the program..
>> What we are talking about is their gains with the ionosphere; the 
>> ionosphere
>> belongs to everyone on the planet.
>> This is not an Alaskan issue. The idea that they're going to create 
>> changes
>> in the ionoshere - which protects us
>> from incoming cosmic radiation, X-rays, and a number of other particles
>> could make life impossible on the planet, and that's why it's really an
>> international issue.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
>> Info, archive and help:
>> http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
> Info, archive and help:
> http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre
>
>

-- 
Forschungs- und Dokumentationszentrum Chile-Lateinamerika - FDCL
- www.fdcl.org
Lateinamerikanachrichten - LN
- www.lateinamerikanachrichten.de
buero: + 49 30 694 6100
mobil: + 49 174 88 99 386