[wos] fyi: The Digital Dirty Dozen
Jeanette Hofmann
wos@post.openoffice.de
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:43:55 +0100
gr=FCsse, jeanette
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa423.pdf
The Digital Dirty Dozen
The Most Destructive High-Tech Legislative
Measures of the 107th Congress
by Wayne Crews and Adam Thierer
Wayne Crews is director of technology policy and Adam =
Thierer is
director of
telecommunications studies at the Cato Institut=
e.
Executive Summary
The past year was a difficult one for the high-technology=
and
telecommunications sectors
of the U.S. economy. Massive layoffs, plunging stock pric=
es, dismal
earning reports,
bankruptcies, and a host of other problems plagued this m=
arket. Market
mania and the
general economic downturn were primary causes of the tech=
sector's woes.
Once bad
times hit, overinflated tech stocks experienced a meteori=
c fall.
It is worth considering whether some of the tech sector's=
troubles can
be linked to the
uncertainty caused by the threat of increasing regulation=
. Whereas
legislative attitudes in
previous sessions of Congress were hands-off in nature, t=
he year 2001
saw policymakers
introduce hundreds of bills that deal with tech policy ma=
tters.
Although very few of those bills were actually passed, th=
e tech sector
finds itself at an
important crossroads: Will policymakers follow a hands-of=
f model that
stresses humility and
regulatory restraint when dealing with cyberspace, leavin=
g most
important decisions to
market forces? Or will they revert to the command-and-con=
trol model that
has long
governed the telecom sector, with regulators molding the =
industry
through endless
intervention in order to satisfy a public interest that t=
hey themselves
define?
As shown in this review of our picks for the 12 most dest=
ructive pieces
of technology
legislation introduced in the 107th Congress, there is go=
od evidence
that
policymakers=97whether through conscious design or not=97=
are adopting the
telecom
regulatory paradigm for the tech sector. It appears that =
the tech sector
may be pigeonholed
into that paradigm simply because it offers a familiar se=
t of rules and
a bank of regulatory
agencies that can be activated on command.
If that happens, it will be a grave blow to the Internet =
sector.
Policymakers would be wise to
reject this paradigm and instead let the Internet and cyb=
erspace evolve
with minimal federal
intrusion and regulatory interference.