[wos] (Fwd) [A2k] Web inventor warns of 'dark' net

[Volker Grassmuck]

Is net neutrality an issue that we should address at wos4 or is it 
robust enough to resist attempts to abolish it, as Sir Tim seems to 
think? In the second case we might still celebrate the equality and 
freedom that are quasi hard-wired into the net, but we might also use 
scarce panel time for more pressing issues. What do you think?

Volker


------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	"Teresa Hackett (eIFL)" <teresa.hackett at eifl.net>
To:             	A2K list <a2k at lists.essential.org>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5009250.stm

Web inventor warns of 'dark' net
By Jonathan Fildes
BBC News science and technology reporter in Edinburgh

The web should remain neutral and resist attempts to fragment it into
different services, web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee has said.

Recent attempts in the US to try to charge for different levels of
online access web were not "part of the internet model," he said in
Edinburgh.

He warned that if the US decided to go ahead with a two-tier internet,
the network would enter "a dark period".

Sir Tim was speaking at the start of a conference on the future of the web.

"What's very important from my point of view is that there is one web,"
he said.

"Anyone that tries to chop it into two will find that their piece looks
very boring."

An equal net

The British scientist developed the web in 1989 as an academic tool to
allow scientists to share data. Since then it has exploded into every
area of life.

However, as it has grown, there have been increasingly diverse opinions
on how it should evolve.

The World Wide Web Consortium, of which Sir Tim is the director,
believes in an open model.

This is based on the concept of network neutrality, where everyone has
the same level of access to the web and that all data moving around the
web is treated equally.

This view is backed by companies like Microsoft and Google, who have
called for legislation to be introduced to guarantee net neutrality.

The first steps towards this were taken last week when members of the US
House of Representatives introduced a net neutrality bill.

Pay model

But telecoms companies in the US do not agree. They would like to
implement a two-tier system, where data from companies or institutions
that can pay are given priority over those that cannot.

This has particularly become an issue with the transmission of TV shows
over the internet, with some broadband providers wanting to charge
content providers to carry the data.

The internet community believes this threatens the open model of the
internet as broadband providers will become gatekeepers to the web's
content.

Providers that can pay will be able to get a commercial advantage over
those that cannot.

There is a fear that institutions like universities and charities would
also suffer.

The web community is also worried that any charges would be passed on to
the consumer.

Optimism

Sir Tim said this was "not the internet model". The "right" model, as
exists at the moment, was that any content provider could pay for a
connection to the internet and could then put any content on to the web
with no discrimination.

Speaking to reporters in Edinburgh at the WWW2006 conference, he argued
this was where the great benefit of the internet lay.

"You get this tremendous serendipity where I can search the internet and
come across a site that I did not set out to look for," he said.

A two-tier system would mean that people would only have full access to
those portions of the internet that they paid for and that some
companies would be given priority over others.

But Sir Tim was optimistic that the internet would resist attempts to
fragment.

"I think it is one and will remain as one," he said.

The WWW2006 conference will run until Friday at the International
Conference Centre in Edinburgh.
http://www2006.org/
_______________________________________________
A2k mailing list
A2k at lists.essential.org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
------- End of forwarded message -------
-- 
   WOS 4. Information Freedom Rules
      14-16 Sept. 2006, Berlin, http://wizards-of-os.org
   iRights           http://iRights.info
       Grimme-Preis für iRights: jetzt abstimmen:
       http://tvspielfilm.msn.de/news/specials/g/grimmeonlineaward
   copy = right    http://privatkopie.net
   home:   http://waste.informatik.hu-berlin.de/Grassmuck


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WPM$3C5F.PM$
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3577 bytes
Desc: Mail message body
Url : http://coredump.buug.de/pipermail/wos/attachments/20060524/045858ca/WPM3C5F.obj