JSalloum@aol.com JSalloum@aol.com
Mon, 1 Apr 2002 04:05:32 EST





Source: The Independent - March 30, 2002, Saturday


By Robert Fisk


HOW MUCH longer can Ariel Sharon pretend that he's fighting in the "war 
against terror"? How much longer are we supposed to believe this nonsense? 
How much longer can the Americans remain so gutlessly silent in the face of a 
vicious conflict which is coming close to obscuring the crimes against 
humanity of 11 September? Terror, terror, terror. Like a punctuation mark, 
the word infects every Israeli speech, every American speech, almost every 
newspaper article. When will someone admit the truth: that the Israelis and 
Palestinians are engaged in a dirty colonial war which will leave both sides 
shamed and humiliated?


Just listen to what Sharon has been saying in the past 24 hours. "Arafat is 
an enemy. He decided on a strategy of terror and formed a coalition of 
terror." That's pretty much what President Bush said about Osama bin Laden. 
But what on earth does it mean? That Arafat is actually sending off the 
suicide bombers, choosing the target, the amount of explosives? If he was, 
then surely Sharon would have sent his death squads after the Palestinian 
leader months ago. After all, his killers have managed to murder dozens of 
Palestinian gunmen already, including occasional women and children who get 
in the way. The real problem with Arafat is that he has a lot in common with 
Sharon: old, ruthless and cynical; both men have come to despise each other. 
Sharon believes that the Palestinians can be broken by military power. He 
doesn't realise what the rest of the world learned during Sharon's own 1982 
siege of Beirut: that the Arabs are no longer afraid. Once a people lose 
their fear, they cannot be re-inoculated with fear. Once the suicide bomber 
is loose, the war cannot be won. And Arafat knows this.


No, of course he doesn't send the bombers off on their wicked missions to 
restaurants and supermarkets. But he does know that every suicide bombing 
destroys Sharon's credibility and proves that the Israeli leader's promises 
of security are false. Arafat is well aware that the ferocious bombers are 
serving his purpose - however much he may condemn them in public.


But he - like Sharon - also believes his enemies can be broken by fire. He 
thinks that the Israelis can be frightened into withdrawing from the West 
Bank and Gaza and East Jerusalem. Ultimately, the Israelis probably will have 
to give up their occupation. But the Jews of Israel are not going to run or 
submit to an endless war of attrition. Even if Sharon is voted out of power - 
a prospect for which many Israelis pray - the next Israeli prime minister is 
not going to negotiate out of fear of the suicide bomber.


Thus the rhetoric becomes ever more cruel, ever more revolting. Hamas calls 
its Jewish enemies "the sons of pigs and monkeys", while Israeli leaders have 
variously bestialised their enemies as "serpents", "crocodiles", "beasts" and 
"cockroaches". Now we have an Israeli officer - according to the Israeli 
daily Ma'ariv - advising his men to study the tactics adopted by the Nazis in 
the Second World War. "If our job is to seize a densely packed refugee camp 
or take over the Nablus casbah, and if this job is given to an

(Israeli) officer to carry out without casualties on both sides, he must 
before all else analyse and bring together the lessons of past battles, even 
- shocking though this might appear - to analyse how the German army operated 
in the Warsaw ghetto."


Pardon? What on earth does this mean? Does this account for the numbers 
marked by the Israelis on the hands and foreheads of Palestinian prisoners 
earlier this month? Does this mean that an Israeli soldier is now to regard 
the Palestinians as sub-humans - which is exactly how the Nazis regarded the 
trapped and desperate Jews of the Warsaw ghetto in 1944?


Yet from Washington comes only silence. And silence, in law, gives consent. 
Should we be surprised? After all, the US is now making the rules as it goes 
along. Prisoners can be called "illegal combatants" and brought to Guantanamo 
Bay with their mouths taped for semi-secret trials. The Afghan war is 
declared a victory - and then suddenly explodes again. Now we are told there 
will be other "fronts" in Afghanistan, a spring offensive by "terrorists". 
Washington has also said that its intelligence agencies - the heroes who 
failed to discover the 11 September plot - have proof (undisclosed, of 
course) that Arafat has "a new alliance" with Iran, which brings the 
Palestinians into the "axis of evil."


Is there no one to challenge this stuff? Just over a week ago, CIA director 
George Tenet announced that Iraq had links with al-Qa'ida. "Contacts and 
linkages", have been established, he told us. And that's what the headlines 
said. But then Tenet continued by saying that the mutual antipathy of 
al-Qa'ida and Iraq towards America and Saudi Arabia "suggests that tactical 
cooperation between them is possible?" "Suggests?" "Possible?" is that what 
Mr Tenet calls proof?


But now everyone is cashing in on the "war against terror". When Macedonian 
cops gun down seven Arabs, they announce that they are participating in the 
global "war on terror". When Russians massacre Chechens, they are now 
prosecuting the "war on terror". When Israel fires at Arafat's headquarters, 
it says it is participating in the "war on terror". Must we all be hijacked 
into America's dangerous self -absorption with the crimes of 11 September? 
Must this vile war between Palestinians and Israelis be distorted in so 
dishonest a way?