[spectre] old discu[rsive]ssion + portents of history

[][mez][]

_"_



is the threat of deracination that l[arge]ooming?

i guess i somewot resign myself to the perpetual communication ethic that 
is displayed + ratified via email discussions like these, that tend 2 have 
an almost n.built tendency to derail the potential for expanding [+ hence 
end up stained with reductionististic overcasts] any presentation of 
genre_structures thru the need 2
a) m.bed them in[2] a historical framework/grounding, no matter how loosely 
d.fined +
b) draw threads 2wards analytical reasoning rather then n.courage 
communication methods||fractures that r utilised by the medium itself 
[echos of print-based culture, any1?;)]........

ie
[d|n.duction via m.plied confliction/competition of sub(e)jective dia-as 
opposed 2 multi-logue connexion(s)]
[m.ploy covertly_engineered friction minus the screech of troll-baiting + 
then mask the conflict rub as theorised learning curves]
[non_spiral data adoption + edge 2wards genre-formulations thru the 
predicated rather than anomalous media x.tensions].



_"_

.(c)[lick].
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/